Monday 30 August 2010

The Modern Samurai

The Modern Samurai
A few hundred years ago in the western world there were those who chose to serve in the protection of their employers and they were called “Musketeers”. In the Far East, they were known as “Samurai”. No matter what they were called, all knew the definition of their profession and their duties: to keep their Patrons safe and secure wherever they went.

Many romantic stories and legends were told about these unique individuals and in most of these stories they were described as the bravest of warriors, heroes or supermen. This profession created an aura around those who chose to specialize and live by the rules of the field. It is one of the oldest professions in the world.
This sector gave society a few norms of behavior that gained high respect and honor from its communities.

In the 21st century, those who deal with the protection of their employers are called Bodyguards, Close Protection Operatives, and VIP/Executive Protection Specialists. More recently, they have been called PSD Operators and Personal Security Details/Detachments because of their deployment in Iraq or Afghanistan which have become known as the most dangerous areas for VIPs (not necessary heads of state). These specially trained and highly skilled personnel are hired to protect individuals or assets of organizations that operate in High-Risk environments like Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa and South America.

The massive changes that globalization has brought to all areas of life has also created grave concerns for both personal safety and the protection of investments located in critical areas around the globe.

Security therefore, has taken the forefront in international, governmental and corporate strategies. A significant lack of sufficiently secure and safe conditions prevents and even jeopardizes economic developments, and nowadays even sports events carry the label “Mission Impossible”.

The need for qualified Protection Operatives capable of providing services related to the protection of assets (sensitive installations) and VIPs such as experts, engineers, journalists, UN employees and even cargo ship’s crews has increased tremendously.

Today, due to the high demand and need to privatize certain functions of government to the civilian workforce, this specialized field of protection services has become one of the fastest growing sectors. Countries, companies and organizations worldwide are currently reestablishing themselves in order to fill the void in the security field.

The Protection specialists who were sent to do these special jobs were sent by organizations that saw the need for such Protection specialists as a force multiplier for the protection of their assets in hostile environments. These special Protection operatives provide a great service to their countries by protecting national interests across the globe.

Governments send them for their convenience and cost effectiveness. But we don't want to officially acknowledge our desperate need for them. They fight alongside and in most cases even protect military personnel in these hostile zones.

So why do we not support them, respect their efforts, their great contribution to our society by providing a service to our countries that no one else will take responsibility to do? Instead of supporting them we call them “Soldiers of Fortune or Mercenaries” and any other name that we can think of without stopping to realize that they did not create or start the conflict. Instead, they are only there to help. Our elected officials are the people who started the conflict.

Do we dislike them now because they are paid for their services, perform everyday in environments that we only see in our worst nightmares, by showing us how cowardly we really are by not helping our own countries, or because we do not want to cope with very real knowledge that they get the job done even when the military can't?

Do we fear the trauma that many of them suffer just as military personnel do? Why do we fear them so?

We place them in a category that will calm our own fears without realizing that they have helped with that calming effect, yet they still have nightmares and fears well after they return from the violent abyss that we sent them to.

A prime example of such defamation of security contractors and protection specialists can be seen in the media, particularly in the recent movie “The A-Team” where protection operatives, clearly allegorical to a well known PMC, are portrayed as murderers and traitors to their country (performing acts such as killing US Generals). This is a ridiculous and damaging portrayal and it should not be allowed to happen even for mere entertainment purposes in a movie.

If you agree with this analysis please join our protest against this movie and against the media's negative portrayal of private security and close protection operatives in general who are putting their lives at risk for the well being of others.

This analysis was carried out by Mirza David, Founder and CEO of the International Security Academy - Israel, which operates practical training centers for improving and enhancing the mental and physical functions of Protection Management and Personnel worldwide and had the honor to train and enhance the skills of thousands of these protection operatives during the years 2004 - 2010.

Monday 23 August 2010

The Israeli Approach to Better Coping with Homeland Security Issues

During the years 2001-2004 Israel faced a dramatic increase in suicide terror attacks in public areas (as many as 10-12 events monthly). Since 2005 there has been a massive reduction such terror on the cities’ streets of Israel and it's roots have been mitigated and rolled back on a very large scale. Let us look at how Israel has managed to cope with and counter this terrible threat and analyse in particular one of the key factors in this fight, the role of private security organs in the greater security system.

Among the reasons for Israel’s tremendous ability to cope with such daily threats, we can identify four main traits which have strengthened our resilience in the face of the unrelenting terror and violence that has plagued us for so long. Firstly is the presence of a strong leadership which has shown in the past that it can put aside differences to steer the nation and give them strength when the security of the nation as a whole is at risk. Secondly the Israeli homeland security apparatus (Police, Military and Other Security Services) is well trained and well equipped to deal with contemporary threats quickly and effectively. Thirdly is the civilian population itself. Israeli citizens have all done military service and their level of preparedness aided in quick and effective response to acts of violence, minimizing their effect, aiding in recovery afterwards and even contributing to outright prevention. Their support for the leadership's solutions enabled us all to find the strength to withstand and overcome terror and violence at its worst. The fourth factor is the presence of a very involved and dynamic private security sector that fills in the gaps where the government cannot and contribute to completing a solid and steady line against threats to the Israeli public.

We will now expand on this somewhat unique involvement of the private sector in homeland security. Because of the situation in Israel there are many private security companies especially because security is required for any place in which large groups of people may gather. This security needs to cope not only with the traditional petty crime that their counterparts outside of Israel have to but also with the threat of terrorism in its various forms and even attacks on the home front during a war. Serious terrorist attacks have often been thwarted not by police or Special Forces but by an observant security guard on the ground.

In order to act effectively the relationship between private security companies and the government has had to become very open and very mutually inclusive. Private security companies are informed by police intelligence briefs of potential threats, all private security training is government regulated, government emergency and natural disaster plans are designed to factor in the private companies and their employees. A good example can be the recent Homeland Security drill held in Israel where the entire country underwent a simulated ballistic missile attack. Private security guards evacuated civilians from public areas, coordinated rescue services and police forces as well as worked under them when the situation called for it.

Cooperation between private security companies and government security entities can be a great asset to the function of both as well as being able to provide better protection for human life which is essentially the greatest goal for all to strive towards.

Governments and private security companies in other countries should be encouraged to enter such a beneficial relationship and do away with much of the antagonism and perceived competition that exists between them. As we experienced here the correct balance of roles is a result of much trial and error but a commitment by both sides will ensure a better living environment for all and a more effective counter to those who choose to threaten the tranquillity of that environment.

This analysis was carried out by Mr. Mirza David, Founder and CEO of the International Security Academy - Israel, which provides solutions for domestic security related issues and Shane Goodson, an International Security Academy coordinator.
http://www.securityacademy.com